U.S. President Barak Obama gets emotion as he address the nation on the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting (Image source: Wiki Commons, credit to: Lawrence Jackson) |
The main obstacles to his plans have been a number of Republican Congressmen and women, and members of the National Rifle Association (NRA), who argue, that they will not support any legislation which contravenes their constitutional right to bear arms.
Obama’s plans are for universal background checks, a ban on
automatic assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition cartridges. The problem
that the President has is although 90 percent of the population support the
need for tougher laws on gun controls, many Republicans in Congress, will only
support universal background checks, as to prevent criminals and the mentally
ill accessing a weapon. Republican Senators have come out this week and stated
that they will try every political trick available, including filibusting the
legislation, meaning it will need 60 percent approval rather then a simple
majority vote.
I think, if 90 percent of Americans who have cherished the
right to bear arms for over 300 years, but are now willing to compromise for
the shake of preventing any more mass killings because of ideas of liberty, the
U.S should not call itself a democracy. I do not understand the argument of
the few who fear losing the right to bear arms, it is not like they will not be
able to own a gun, all that Obama is proposing is for eliminating weapons
that can kill many innocent
men, women and children in one short moment.
In Australia and other parts of the world, governments
have legislated into law tough gun controls similar to the proposed ones in the
US , which of course have not fully
eliminated the use of guns in crimes, but have prevented mass killings on
almost monthly bases as seen in the US . I hope in the end Obamas campaign, with
the support of majority of the nation will be able to persuade the reluctant
few to say yay on the floor of Congress.
No comments:
Post a Comment