Five Australian soldiers died last week; three were killed this week in a patrol base in the Oruzgan province in
Every time an Australian soldier is killed, especially by a Afghan soldier, debates and opinions are all over the media on the question whether Australian forces should leave early or stay until 2014 as planned, with some arguing that
On the other side of the debate, many defence experts, including former soldiers, as well asthe members of both the Liberal and Labour parties, argue that Australia needs to stay.
In my opinion, while the threat of terrorism around the
world has not disappeared because of the continuing mission in Afghanistan , there was justification for Australia in committing troops to the international mission in
the first place.
Afghanistan had been the safe haven for terrorist groups like al-Quada, who are not native to Afghanistan, and who were
perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks in New York. Their radical methods have caused both local Afghanis and the international communities pain and suffering with their fundamental ideas. Thus as
a committed member of the international community, we are obliged to
participate in the mission to remove terrorist groups who attacked our
international partners.
If Australia cut and run and leave our Afghan Army partners half trained, likely chance the Taliban would return to power. Instead, we should maintain our current troop numbers and finish the mission that we started, not just for a better future for the Afghan people, but also in respect for the diggers who have already lost their lives, showing that their deaths were not in vein.
If Australia cut and run and leave our Afghan Army partners half trained, likely chance the Taliban would return to power. Instead, we should maintain our current troop numbers and finish the mission that we started, not just for a better future for the Afghan people, but also in respect for the diggers who have already lost their lives, showing that their deaths were not in vein.
No comments:
Post a Comment